I painted Mona's birthday portrait a couple weeks ago (remember? it was a lesson painting in early July), and was pleased with it at the time. But as the days went by, I saw things I thought would make the painting better. So out came the edges of the window frame's shadow and in went lavender and cobalt glazes on her body (the image above is the reworked painting). What do you think? Is it now a smidge better? If paintings hang around in my studio for long enough, I nearly always find something I want to change. It's a horrible habit. Thanks, as always, for looking at and sharing my paintings with your friends and family, Kim
|
The cover of "A Dog Named Blue," now available from Blurb publishers. When I first painted Amelia I never imagined that she would be re-christened "Blue" and inspire a book. In her defense, Amelia had a number of other partners in crime - animals who's portraits seemed to fall into a specific color category and prompt color-centric names. In typical ADD fashion, my brain started spinning 100mph. What if I turned those muses' paintings into a picture book for animal loving kids? I shared my idea with three friends in the industry, and they eagerly offered their expertise. I am truly indebted to them. Illustrator and author Matt Faulkner and children's book author and literacy expert Kristen Remenar edited an early version of the draft. They suggested key plot/conceptual changes that made it oodles better. Designer Elizabeth St. Hilaire Nelson worked her magic, pairing the images with perfectly color...
Hi Kimberly- So happy to have found you- yes, I agree, it's a tad bit more dynamic! Nadi (http://www.NadiSpencer.com).
ReplyDeleteThanks, Nadi! :)
ReplyDeleteJe crois que l'oeil de l'artiste a eu raison... Parfois il faut un certain temps pour voir ce qu'il fallait voir... et cette correction est très légitime...
ReplyDeletegros bisous
Time allows the eye to see things differently, that's for sure! Thanks, Martine!
ReplyDelete